Comparison of Three Quality Slip Rings to Mercotac Model 430

Brand

Specification

Mercotac ® 430 Slip Ring Brand #1U.S.A. Slip Ring Brand #2 U.S.A. Slip Ring Brand #3U.S.A.
No. of Contacts 4 4 4 4
Contact Resistance Ohms .001* .0125 .008 na
Price Ratio 1* 2.7 x 3.5 x 3.6 x
Maintenance Interval / Revs. Zero* 500,000** 500,000 500,000**
Life Cycle in Revolutions 500,000,000+* 50,000,000 6,000,000 10,000,000
Speed RPM (maximum) 1200* 100 500 125
Voltage Range 0-250 120-300 0-150 0-600
Amps Range 0-30 0-40 0-5 0-35

Real Life Example Based on a laminating machine operating one eight-hour shift per day, five days per week.
Maintenance Cost Over Lifetimef Zero $4,935 $588 $994
Lifetimef 72 mos. 47 mos. 5.6 mos. 9.5 mos.
TOTAL COST COMPARISON Maintenance & Purchase Price 1.0 41.4 x 8.1 x 11.5 x

** Industry recommended intervals, 500,000 revolutions or 6 months.

Maintenance labor calculated at $50 per 45 min. maintenance interval.
Lifetime based on 200 RPM for Mercotac, 100 RPM for Brand 1, Brand 2 and Brand 3.

*Critical Specifications in Chart showing Mercotac superiority

  • Contact Resistance: The extremely low contact resistance of Mercotac connectors allows them to transmit low voltage signals without distortion which is
    not possible with slip rings.
  • Price: Significantly lower cost of Mercotac units makes them usable in many applications where slip rings would be economically unfeasible.
  • Maintenance: Zero maintenance of Mercotac connectors reduces customer labor costs significantly, making them much more affordable than slip rings.
  • Life Cycle: The long life cycle of Mercotac connectors makes them more efficient and affordable than slip rings which need replacing much more often.
  • RPM: The higher RPM specification of Mercotac connectors allows them to be used in applications where slip rings will not work.